The government is ambiguous in the media support law when it refers to “high-quality editorial content,” according to the Swedish Press, Radio and Television Corporation. In order to have a basis for distributing media support, the authority wants to be more specific, which is what it is proposing now in a regulation proposal.
We want clear directions as possible, and we have not received clearer than that. So we have to explain it, ”says Charlotte Ingvar-Nelson, Director General of the Swedish Press, Radio and Television Authority.
In defining authority itself, they equated “high quality” with “responsibility,” which in turn they believe is not, among other things, to spread incorrect information, mislead science, or encourage crime.
‘Difficult to review content’
Thomas Matson, Tidningsutgivarna CEO, thinks increased clarity about who gets media support is welcome by media companies.
But it’s very difficult to review the content. Thomas Matson says establishing what is responsible journalism, incorrect information, or misleading content is not easy.
Should authority define what constitutes good journalism?
– In principle, you can certainly ask. I can also say that we do not stop publishing newspapers, but we are discussing the support that we should provide to these newspapers. It’s a completely different matter, says Charlotte Ingvar-Nelson of Swedish Press, Radio and Television.
The explanation is already in use
So far, it is a proposal, and it is now offered to consult with a large number of actors. But Charlotte Ingvar-Nelson believes this interpretation of the media support decree has already been made.
We turned down a request on this very basis, as we can see that it consistently features unscientific articles, she says.